Subject-Centredness and Self-Conception as an Inclusive Science of German-Language Pedagogy for Intellectual Disabilities – Convergence or Contradiction? (82483)

Session Information: Indigenous & Inclusive Education
Session Chair: Alyssa Dana Adomaitis

Thursday, 28 November 2024 10:20
Session: Session 1
Room: Room 707 (7F)
Presentation Type: Oral Presentation

All presentation times are UTC + 9 (Asia/Tokyo)

The German Pedagogy for Intellectual Disabilities, having emerged as a distinct path post-World War II, remains relatively underexplored. This research represents a pioneering effort, providing the first comprehensive examination of the self-perception of the Pedagogy for Intellectual Disabilitiesas a scientific discipline within the context of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IASSIDD) conference. This project involved an in-depth analysis of the eight most recent textbooks within the Pedagogy for Intellectual Disabilities. Employing a combination of Open Coding (Strübing, 2014) and discourse-linguistic multilevel analysis (Spitzmüller & Warnke, 2011), the research embraced both deductive and inductive approaches. The majority of PbgB does not regard itself as an inclusive-participative scientific discipline. Notably, our research reveals innovation in recognizing a historical correlation between shifts within the discipline and corresponding changes in educational practice. This is particularly pertinent in light of recent empirical studies indicating that a significant proportion of students in special education focusing on intellectual development lack an intelligence quotient-based intellectual disability. The results underscore the imperative for interdisciplinary reflection within the field of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD). The research's adaptability is highlighted, serving as a foundational resource for subsequent empirical and theoretical inquiries into Pedagogy for Intellectual Disabilities or associated educational practices. The innovative potential lies in leveraging shifts within the discipline as catalysts for positive developments in pedagogical approaches. This study sets the stage for future research by highlighting the need for further exploration into the historical and reciprocal relationship between PID and practice.

Authors:
Jonathan Klix, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany


About the Presenter(s)
Jonathan Klix, Research Associate at Leibniz University Hannover, specializes in pedagogy for intellectual disabilities. His main topics are disciplinary theoretical questions in pedagogy for intellectual disabilities and theories of inclusion.

See this presentation on the full scheduleThursday Schedule


A Note to Presenters

To enhance academic profiles and showcase research, we encourage all presenters and co-presenters to include links to their public LinkedIn, ResearchGate profile, and research websites. Presenters may update their bio for their presentation by completing the form linked below by October 22, 2024.
- Presenter Information Update Form
Submitted changes will be reflected on November 01, 2024

Additionally, presenters should also update their IAFOR account details if there have been any changes to affiliations or biographies.
- https://submit.iafor.org/my-account/edit-account


Conference Comments & Feedback

Place a comment using your LinkedIn profile

Comments

Share on activity feed

Powered by WP LinkPress

Share this Presentation

Posted by Clive Staples Lewis

Last updated: 2023-02-23 23:45:00