This paper focuses on the topic of academic shame and points out its importance in academic culture and its influence on doctoral candidates. Through literature review, the definition of academic shame and related theories of attribution are sorted out. Taking humanities and social science doctoral students in science and technology universities as the research object, the interview data were analyzed by using the method of grounded theory through the steps of open, axial and selective coding. It is found that the results of academic shame attribution are consistent with Weiner's attribution theory, and the influencing factors include internal-instability, internal-stability, external-instability and external-stability factors. It also constructs a model of academic shame attribution, which has been tested to have theoretical saturation. Finally, the model is explained from the aspects of research self-efficacy, personal characteristics, guiding relationships and environmental constraints.

Authors:
Yuqing Zhao, Beihang University, China

About the Presenter(s)
Zhao Yuqing, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, College of Humanities and Social Sciences (Institute of Higher Education), class of 2023, current doctoral student Research Interests: Higher Education Management; Postgraduate Education

See this presentation on the full schedule – Monday Schedule

Bookmark

---

A Note to Presenters

To enhance academic profiles and showcase research, we encourage all presenters and co-presenters to include links to their public LinkedIn, ResearchGate profile, and research websites. Presenters may update their bio for their presentation by completing the form linked below by October 22, 2024.
- Presenter Information Update Form
Submitted changes will be reflected on November 01, 2024

Additionally, presenters should also update their IAFOR account details if there have been any changes to affiliations or biographies.
- https://submit.iafor.org/my-account/edit-account